{"id":28192,"date":"2023-03-01T13:00:37","date_gmt":"2023-03-01T13:00:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/?p=28192"},"modified":"2023-02-24T13:28:32","modified_gmt":"2023-02-24T13:28:32","slug":"analysis-of-public-opinion-on-north-macedonias-accession-to-the-european-union-2014-2022","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/2023\/03\/01\/analysis-of-public-opinion-on-north-macedonias-accession-to-the-european-union-2014-2022\/","title":{"rendered":"Analysis of public opinion on North Macedonia\u2019s accession to the European Union (2014-2022)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The developments in 2022 in the Macedonian accession process have had a slight negative effect on public support for EU membership. In 2022, 64% of the population would vote positively for North Macedonia\u2019s membership in the EU, equaling the results from 2019, which has had the lowest values for positive support in the longitudinal dataset.<\/p>\n<p>These is a considerable gap between the two largest ethnic communities, the ethnic Macedonians and the ethnic Albanians in the country in the levels of support for EU membership. 57% of ethnic Macedonians support EU membership. A significantly higher percent of Albanians (79%) are in favour of EU membership<\/p>\n<p>Almost half of the population indicates the obstructions from neighbouring EU member states as the main barrier to EU membership.<\/p>\n<p>You can read the analysis on the following link:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/analiza2_B5ENG.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Analysis of public opinion on North Macedonia\u2019s accession to the European Union (2014-2022)<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The developments in 2022 in the Macedonian accession process have had a slight negative effect on public support for EU membership. In 2022, 64% of the population would vote positively for North Macedonia\u2019s membership in the EU, equaling the results from 2019, which has had the lowest values for positive support in the longitudinal dataset. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":28195,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1161,1126,1160],"tags":[342,995,1241,1274,1275],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28192"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28192"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28192\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28197,"href":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28192\/revisions\/28197"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/28195"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28192"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28192"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28192"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}