{"id":18457,"date":"2016-05-16T12:44:20","date_gmt":"2016-05-16T12:44:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/?p=4879"},"modified":"2022-03-20T23:43:08","modified_gmt":"2022-03-20T23:43:08","slug":"what-kind-of-situation-is-this","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/2016\/05\/16\/what-kind-of-situation-is-this\/","title":{"rendered":"What kind of situation is this?!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Public opinion survey on the current political events in Macedonia<\/p>\n<p>In a time of culmination of the political crisis which may lead to the first one-party parliamentary elections since the declaration of independence in 1991, next month, the Institute for Democracy \u201cSocietas Civilis\u201d, Skopje (IDSCS) has conducted a public opinion survey on the current events. The survey has been conducted by a telephone on a representative sample of 1016 respondents in the period between 6 and 11 May 2016. The most important findings are the following:<\/p>\n<p>The majority of the respondents (63%) think that there should not be elections where not all of the parties are participating. Thirty-one per cent (31%) find that acceptable.<\/p>\n<p>A total of 55% think the government that should overcome the political crisis should be composed of non-partisan experts or composed of all of the parliamentary political parties. A government established from the 5 June election outcome is a political crisis resolution for 36% of the respondents.<\/p>\n<p>The civil society organizations and movements should be involved in the political negotiations for overcoming the crisis. This opinion is shared by 61% of the respondents. Twenty-seven per cent (27%) of the respondents do not think that the civil society organizations and movements should be involved in the negotiations.<\/p>\n<p>A vast majority of 76% respondents does not justify the pardoning decisions of 56 people for acts related to the wiretapping scandal. Only 16% consider the pardons justified.<\/p>\n<p>A support for the protests (of Protestiram\/Colorful Revolution and GDOM) give 46% of the respondents. Every third citizen (30%) supports the Protestiram\/Colorful Revolution protests and every eighth citizen (12%) supports the GDOM protests.<\/p>\n<p>The citizens are at odds in the assessment of the role of the USA and the EU in the resolution of the political crisis: 45% asses their role negatively, and 42% positively. Nevertheless, the majority of the citizens (53%) think that the USA and the EU have a decisive role in the resolution of the political crisis and that they should be involved more actively (56%).<\/p>\n<p>When it comes to the work of the judicial institutions, on a scale from 1 to 5 the respondents give the highest average score to the Special Public Prosecution Office \u2013 3.22. The Constitutional Court has a score of 2.33, the Public Prosecution Office \u2013 2.32 and the Courts have a score of 2.22.<\/p>\n<p>The negative attitudes prevail while reviewing the question about the attitude towards the political leaders: 55% towards Ali Ahmeti, 52% towards Nikola Gruevski and 48% towards Zoran Zaev.<\/p>\n<p>Nikola Gruevski and Zoran Zaev have nearly equal distribution of positive opinion among the respondents: 33% have spoken positively of Nikola Gruevski and 30% of Zoran Zaev.<\/p>\n<p>The full report from the conducted survey is available on the following link<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/0Bza7D7EZXEf4cVJYVFdSWmFZc28\/view\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">What kind of situation is this?!\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Public opinion survey on the current political events in Macedonia In a time of culmination of the political crisis which may lead to the first one-party parliamentary elections since the declaration of independence in 1991, next month, the Institute for Democracy \u201cSocietas Civilis\u201d, Skopje (IDSCS) has conducted a public opinion survey on the current events. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1161,1121,1160],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18457"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18457"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18457\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22775,"href":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18457\/revisions\/22775"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18457"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18457"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/idscs.org.mk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18457"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}